Welcome

Madhur Matka Result In Delhi High Court Extenn Counter Delhi

37. Dr. Tulzapurkar relied upon the judgment of a learned single Judge of the Delhi High Court in Piruz Khambatta & anr. v. Soex India Pvt. Ltd. & ors. 2012 (49) PTC 330 (Del). In that case, the plaintiff was the registered proprietor of the mark “Rasna”. The action was one for infringement on the ground that the defendants had used the.

Delhi – Stay updated with latest & flash news, Lifestyle & Entertainment, Restaurants & Food, Events, Politics, Climate Updates, from Delhi- Page 11

The Delhi High Court set up the Delhi International Arbitration Centre in 2009, which has its own Rules, last updated in 2018. Otherwise, the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts have the power to appoint arbitrators under the provisions of section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.

कल्याण टिप्स In Signal Enclave Delhi अपनी भाषा में हेल्थ टिप्स, स्वस्थ रहने के उपाय की जानकरी प्राप्त करें – Find health information, health tips in hindi अपनी भाषा में हेल्थ टिप्स, स्वस्थ रहने के उपाय की जानकरी प्राप्त करें – Find health information, health tips in hindi AajTak: Hindi news (हिंदी समाचार) website, watch live tv coverages, Latest Khabar, Breaking

07-06-2018  · In this context, Ld. Counsel has relied upon the judgment of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Linde AG vs. DIT, 365 ITR 1, wherein the Hon’ble High Court has observed that DTAA do not contain any charging provision by virtue of which income tax is levied, because tax is charged by virtue of Section 4 r.w.s. 5 and it is only in the.

27-06-2019  · Related Posts: Turner General Entertainment Networks India Pvt. Ltd vs. ITO (Delhi High Court) It is evident that the concerned authorities and tax officials have to apply their mind to decide an application for stay of demand. This does not, however, mean that any particular AO in a given case has to impose a per se condition that pending consideration of the application for.

27-06-2019  · reliance on the decisions of the Delhi High Court in the case of Sequoia Construction Co. P. Ltd and Others vs. P.P.Suri, ITO, Central Circle, XX, New Delhi reported in 1986 (158) ITR 496 and in the case of Indo Arya Central Transport Limited & Others vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Delhi-1 and Another reported in 2018 SCC Online Del 7995.